Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Reanimator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Obliterator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Midrange | vitorcarvalho01 | 7-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | pnutz47 | 6-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Proliferate , Golgari Analyst , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Deathtouch , Golgari Demons , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Lifedrain Combo
Meta Performance Analysis
Choking Miasma ranks #254 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 63%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Choking Miasma is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 16.70 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Choking Miasma has a win rate of 77.9%, making it 5.0% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Choking Miasma than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 5 | 86.4% | 78.7% | +7.7% |
| The End | Instant | 4 | 5 | 84.6% | 78.2% | +6.4% |
| Mosswood Dreadknight | Creature — Human Knight // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 12 | 78.8% | 74.8% | +4.0% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 12 | 78.1% | 74.9% | +3.2% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 13 | 77.9% | 74.8% | +3.1% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 9 | 78.0% | 75.2% | +2.8% |
| Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 12 | 77.6% | 75.2% | +2.4% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 8 | 78.6% | 76.3% | +2.3% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 12 | 78.8% | 76.8% | +2.0% |
| Maelstrom Pulse | Sorcery | 3 | 13 | 78.2% | 76.9% | +1.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 362 | 46.6% | 45.4% |
| Golgari Demons | 345 | 63.3% | 46.3% |
| Golgari Obliterator | 10 | 66.7% | 59.7% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 7 | 23.3% | 52.7% |
| Golgari Reanimator | 4 | 30.8% | 33.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.